Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 50:16 — 8.6MB)
Subscribe: RSS
What do golden tumors, rats, and a falling fish-god have to do with Abraham and Sarah? This Bible study on 1 Samuel 5–6 dives into the strange journey of the Ark of the Covenant through Philistia, the humiliation of Dagon, and the mysterious plagues that follow. We connect these events to Genesis 20 and Abimelech, exploring how God protects His covenant, exposes false gods, and responds when His presence is treated like a lucky charm instead of holy.
Philistia falsely believed their victory came from the benevolence of their gods, particularly Dagon, their fertility god. However in 1st Samuel 5-6, we discover God’s hand in this event as the Philistines slowly discover who is more powerful — Dagon or the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob — and how God, with patience and humor, revealed His power to the ignorant Philistines.
Introduction
1 Samuel 5–6 presents one of the most vivid narratives surrounding the Ark of the Covenant. The Ark moves from Israel to Philistia and back again. Along the way, it confronts a pagan deity, devastates cities, and exposes how nations respond to the holiness of the God of Israel.
At the same time, Genesis 20 provides an earlier pattern. Abraham and Sarah enter the territory of Abimelech in Gerar. A deception about Sarah’s identity leads to divine intervention that protects the covenant promise.
Taken together, these accounts highlight how God guards His covenant, confronts idolatry, and disciplines both Israel and the nations. They also anticipate a greater fulfillment in the coming of Messiah and the handling of His presence and promise.
The Ark Captured and Brought to Ashdod
1 Samuel 5 follows the defeat of Israel in battle. Israel has brought the Ark from Shiloh as a kind of guarantee of victory (1 Samuel 4:3–4). Instead, Israel loses, and the Philistines capture the Ark (1 Samuel 4:10–11).
The Philistines carry the Ark from Ebenezer to Ashdod (1 Samuel 5:1). They place it in the temple of Dagon, their chief deity. The text identifies Dagon simply as their god (1 Samuel 5:2). Historically, Dagon appears as a grain or fertility deity and often as a figure associated with the sea.
In this setting, the Ark stands not merely as a religious object. It represents the enthroned presence of YHWH (יהוה, YHWH, “LORD”). While the Philistines treat it as a captured idol, the narrative quickly shows a different reality.
Dagon’s Humiliation Before the Ark
The next morning, the priests of Dagon find their god fallen on his face before the Ark (1 Samuel 5:3). The posture of Dagon mimics worship or submission. The priests set the statue back in its place.
However, the following day, they discover Dagon fallen again. This time, the head and the palms of the hands lie cut off on the threshold (1 Samuel 5:4). Only the torso remains. The scene communicates total humiliation and dismemberment.
The head in biblical symbolism represents authority. The hands represent power or action. The narrative portrays Dagon as a powerless idol. Psalm 115:4–7 and Psalm 135:15–18 describe idols as having mouths, eyes, ears, and hands that do not function.
As a result, the priests and worshipers of Dagon develop a superstition. They no longer step on the threshold of Dagon’s temple in Ashdod (1 Samuel 5:5). Instead of abandoning Dagon, they sacralize the place of his humiliation. The sign exposes the impotence of their god; yet their response falls short of full repentance toward the God of Israel.
The Plague on Ashdod, Gath, and Ekron
The narrative then shifts from the temple to the wider population. The “hand of the LORD” (יד־יהוה, yad YHWH, “hand of the LORD”) grows heavy on Ashdod and its surroundings (1 Samuel 5:6). The people experience severe afflictions.
Most English translations render the term as “tumors” (עֹפְלִים, ‘ophelim, “tumors”). Some traditions and commentators connect this term with painful swellings or hemorrhoids. The context later adds rats or mice (1 Samuel 6:4–5), which suggests an outbreak of disease, possibly involving both pestilence and painful bodily symptoms.
The men of Ashdod recognize the connection between their suffering and the Ark. They conclude that the Ark cannot stay with them, because the hand of the God of Israel is harsh against them and against Dagon (1 Samuel 5:7). Consequently, they call together the rulers of the Philistines and move the Ark to Gath (1 Samuel 5:8).
In Gath, the judgment intensifies. The text states that the hand of the LORD comes against the city with very great confusion and afflicts both small and great with tumors (1 Samuel 5:9). The pattern shows escalation. The longer the Ark remains in Philistia, the more severe the consequences.
Then the Ark proceeds to Ekron. The Ekronites react in horror. They cry out that the Ark has been brought to them to kill them and their people (1 Samuel 5:10). At this point, death spreads through the city. Those who do not die suffer from the tumors, and the cry of the city goes up to heaven (1 Samuel 5:11–12).
This sequence demonstrates both judgment and revelation. The Philistines perceive that the God of Israel acts among them. They see the Ark as the visible point of contact with His presence and power. However, they still relate to Him in fear and distance rather than in covenant obedience.
Seven Months in Philistia and the Counsel of the Priests
1 Samuel 6 opens by stating that the Ark has remained in the “country” or “field” of the Philistines for seven months (1 Samuel 6:1). The term suggests that at some point they place the Ark outside the cities, perhaps viewing it as too dangerous to keep inside urban centers.
Eventually, the Philistines call for priests and diviners. They ask what to do with the Ark and how to return it to its place (1 Samuel 6:2). The religious experts advise sending it back with a guilt offering. They insist that they must not send the Ark away empty (רֵיקָם, reqam, “empty”), but must return it with tribute (1 Samuel 6:3).
The recommended offering includes five golden tumors and five golden rats, corresponding to the five lords of the Philistines (1 Samuel 6:4). The symbols match the instruments of the plague. The priests explain that the images will give glory (כָּבוֹד, kavod, “glory”) to the God of Israel. They hope that He will lighten His hand from them, their gods, and their land (1 Samuel 6:5).
They then warn their own people not to harden their hearts (כָּבֵד לֵב, kaved lev, “harden the heart”) as Pharaoh and the Egyptians did when God worked mightily among them (1 Samuel 6:6; cf. Exodus 7–12). The reference to Egypt shows that the Philistines know of the earlier acts of YHWH. Their interpretation of current events stands within that memory of power and judgment.
The Test with the Milk Cows
The Philistine leaders want confirmation that the plagues truly come from the God of Israel and not by coincidence. The priests therefore prescribe a test. The people must take a new cart and two cows that have never been yoked. They must separate the cows from their calves, hitch the cows to the cart, and place the Ark on it along with a chest containing the golden objects (1 Samuel 6:7–8).
The instruction then introduces a sign. If the cows go straight up the road to Beth-shemesh in Israelite territory, the Philistines will know that the God of Israel has brought the disaster. If the cows wander or turn back toward their calves, they will attribute the plagues to chance (1 Samuel 6:9).
The men follow the instructions. The cows go straight along the highway to Beth-shemesh. They do not turn to the right or the left. They low as they go, yet they keep to the path. The lords of the Philistines follow them as far as the border (1 Samuel 6:10–12).
In this way, God uses even untrained animals to bear witness. The cows act contrary to their natural instincts. They model submission to the direction of the unseen God. Their behavior confirms to the Philistines that the affliction has indeed come from YHWH.
Joy and Judgment in Beth-shemesh
The men of Beth-shemesh happen to reap the wheat harvest in the valley when they lift their eyes and see the Ark (1 Samuel 6:13). They rejoice greatly. The cart enters the field of Joshua of Beth-shemesh and stops by a large stone (1 Samuel 6:14).
The people split the wood of the cart and offer the cows as a burnt offering to the LORD. The Levites take down the Ark and the chest with the golden objects and set them on the large stone. That day the men of Beth-shemesh offer burnt offerings and sacrifices to the LORD (1 Samuel 6:14–15).
The five lords of the Philistines observe this and return to Ekron that same day (1 Samuel 6:16). The narrative then lists the golden tumors and rats as the guilt offering (1 Samuel 6:17–18).
However, the joy in Beth-shemesh does not last. The LORD strikes down many of the men because they look into the Ark (1 Samuel 6:19). The text in many manuscripts gives the number as 50,070. Yet, as discussed in the study, the Hebrew construction appears unusual. It may indicate 70 men and an additional group designated by the term אֶלֶף (’elef, often “thousand,” but also possibly “clan,” “chief,” or “unit”). In any case, the point centers on the seriousness of irreverence toward the Ark.
The people mourn because of this great slaughter. They ask, “Who is able to stand before the LORD, this holy God?” and they question where the Ark should go from them (1 Samuel 6:20). The inhabitants of Kiriath-jearim receive a message asking them to come and take the Ark (1 Samuel 6:21).
Thus Israel also experiences judgment. The Philistines have acted in ignorance and fear. Israel, on the other hand, possesses the Torah. The people of Beth-shemesh should know that no one may treat the Ark as a curiosity. Numbers 4:15 warns that the Kohathites may carry the holy objects, but must not touch them or they will die. The response of God in Beth-shemesh confirms that His holiness applies equally toward His own people.
Genesis 20 and the Pattern of Bodily Affliction
Genesis 20 presents a related pattern. Abraham and Sarah travel to Gerar between Kadesh and Shur. Abraham says that Sarah is his sister, and Abimelech king of Gerar takes her (Genesis 20:1–2).
God appears to Abimelech in a dream. He declares that Abimelech is a dead man because he has taken another man’s wife (Genesis 20:3). Abimelech protests his innocence, explaining that both Abraham and Sarah claimed a sibling relationship (Genesis 20:4–5). God acknowledges Abimelech’s integrity, notes that He has kept him from sinning, and commands him to restore Sarah to Abraham, who is a prophet (נָבִיא, navi’, “prophet”) (Genesis 20:6–7).
Abimelech obeys. He rebukes Abraham, then returns Sarah and gives Abraham sheep, oxen, servants, and permission to dwell in the land (Genesis 20:8–15). Furthermore, he gives Sarah a thousand pieces of silver as a public vindication (Genesis 20:16).
Abraham then prays to God, and God heals Abimelech, his wife, and his maidservants, so that they bear children (Genesis 20:17). The narrative explains that the LORD had closed fast all the wombs (רֶחֶם, rechem, “womb”) of the household because of Sarah (Genesis 20:18).
In both Genesis 20 and 1 Samuel 5–6, a foreign ruler takes into his control something that carries the covenant promise. In Genesis 20, Sarah bears the promise of the coming son through whom the covenant line will continue (Genesis 17:15–19). In 1 Samuel 5–6, the Ark bears the testimony of the covenant (אֲרוֹן הַבְּרִית, aron ha-berit, “Ark of the covenant”) and the tablets of the Law (cf. Deuteronomy 10:1–5).
In both cases, God responds with bodily affliction that blocks fertility or normal bodily function. In Gerar, He closes wombs. In Philistia, He strikes the people with tumors and brings death through plague. In both contexts, the affliction ceases when the covenant object or person returns to the proper place and order.
These parallels show a consistent divine pattern. God protects the vessels of His covenant and intervenes when human fear or unbelief mishandles them.
Covenant, Misplaced Trust, and the Ark as “Shield”
Both accounts also expose patterns of misplaced trust among the people of God. Abraham fears for his own life and effectively uses Sarah as a “shield” (Genesis 20:11–13). He believes that the fear of God does not exist in the land and assumes that the people will kill him for Sarah’s sake.
Similarly, Israel in 1 Samuel 4 brings the Ark into battle as a kind of guarantee against defeat. The elders say, “Let us take to ourselves from Shiloh the ark of the covenant of the LORD, that it may come among us and deliver us from the power of our enemies” (1 Samuel 4:3, NASB 1995). The people place their confidence in the object rather than in obedient relationship with the God who dwells above it.
In both cases, God overturns the human strategy. Abraham retains his life, but faces a rebuke from a Gentile king. Israel loses the battle, loses the Ark for a season, and experiences judgment even after its return.
These narratives together emphasize that the covenant symbols—whether Sarah as the bearer of the promised seed, or the Ark as the bearer of the testimony—do not function as magical protections. God Himself acts as the shield (מָגֵן, magen, “shield”; cf. Genesis 15:1). Trust must rest in Him, not in the mere presence of sacred objects.
Idolatry, Holiness, and the Nations
The fall of Dagon and the plagues on the Philistines reveal the superiority of YHWH over the gods of the nations. Yet the narrative does not end with their destruction. The Philistines receive an opportunity to acknowledge the God of Israel by giving glory to Him and by submitting to the guidance of His presence as the Ark returns.
At the same time, Israel’s judgment at Beth-shemesh shows that the people of the covenant do not stand above correction. Holiness (קֹדֶשׁ, qodesh, “holiness”) remains central. “Who is able to stand before the LORD, this holy God?” (1 Samuel 6:20, NASB 1995). That question echoes throughout Scripture and finds a fuller answer in passages such as Psalm 24:3–4 and Hebrews 10:19–22 (ἁγιότης, hagiotēs, “holiness”).
From this perspective, the Ark in 1 Samuel and the events in Genesis 20 anticipate a further development. The covenant promise ultimately focuses on a coming descendant of Abraham (זֶרַע, zera‘, “seed”; Genesis 22:18; Galatians 3:16, σπέρμα, sperma, “seed”) and on the presence of God dwelling among His people in a more direct way (John 1:14, σκηνόω, skēnoō, “to tabernacle”).
Just as mishandling Sarah and the Ark leads to judgment and yet to revelation, so mishandling the person and work of that promised descendant brings both judgment and the possibility of redemption. The repeating patterns in these texts prepare the way for understanding the gravity of responding rightly to God’s covenant presence when it appears in history.
Conclusion
1 Samuel 5–6 and Genesis 20 together portray a God who guards His covenant with determination. He topples idols, afflicts bodies, restricts fertility, and arranges unlikely signs with animals. He warns both Israel and the nations. He exposes misplaced trust in symbols, strategies, and human calculations.
Yet He also reveals Himself through these same events. The Philistines learn to fear the God of Israel and to give Him glory. Abimelech learns to respect the marriage covenant of Abraham and Sarah. Israel learns—through painful discipline—that joy in the Ark must accompany reverence and obedience.
Through these accounts, a consistent pattern emerges. God remains faithful to His promises. He protects the vessels of His covenant. He confronts idolatry. He disciplines His people. And He points forward to a greater fulfillment in the one who embodies the covenant and brings the presence of God near in a permanent and holy way.
Speaker: Daniel Agee.
Discover more from Hallel Fellowship
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.