Acts 4:1-31 — Boldness in the name of God’s salvation, Yeshua the Messiah

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 1:09:38 — 12.0MB)

Subscribe: RSS

On the day after Shavuot (Pentecost), the priesthood and the Sanhedrin find themselves on trial—even as they place Peter and John on trial—faced with a critical question: Will they cling to their presuppositions about God—that He created the world and then withdrew—or will they submit to the overwhelming displays of God’s power in His house of prayer, affirming that Yeshua is truly God’s Messiah?

Insiders to the Truth: Believing Members of the Sanhedrin and the Trial of Yeshua’s Emissaries

In Acts 4, the Apostles Peter and John were put on trial before the Sanhedrin because of their bold proclamations that Yeshua of Nazareth was the Messiah. We have a detailed record of the  internal conversation in the Sanhedrin, the Supreme Court of Israel and people wonder how this information was relayed to Luke for inclusion in the Book of Acts.

There are a few potential sources for the report of the internal Sanhedrin conversation, as we know there were believers in Yeshua among the Sanhedrin:

• Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus, who were known believers within the Sanhedrin.
• The Apostle Paul himself, who was a student of Gamaliel at the time, could have recalled the details of the trial to Luke later.
• An unnamed believer within the Sanhedrin who reported the details to the early Christian community

Vexed in the Temple: How Yeshua’s Name Shook the Sadducees to Their Core

In Acts 4:1-3, the Sadducees were specifically mentioned and greatly disturbed due to profound theological and institutional challenges. They did not believe in resurrection, miracles, or angels, and the miraculous healing of a man at the Beautiful Gate of the temple, which is recorded in Acts 3, directly contradicted their core religious beliefs. This healing occurred in their primary sphere of religious and administrative control, which made the event even more provocative.

Peter’s preaching about Jesus’ resurrection was a direct assault on Sadducean doctrine, and the healing done in Jesus’ name – whom they had crucified – further challenged their authority. The rapidly growing number of believers (now 5,000) threatened their social and religious power structure. The Greek term describing their reaction (diaponeo) suggests they were not merely intellectually annoyed, but deeply emotionally and spiritually disturbed – “travailing in mind” with a visceral response to these events.

The miracle represented more than a simple religious disagreement; it was a fundamental challenge to their entire religious worldview and institutional power. By happening at the temple gate and being connected to Jesus’ name, the healing struck at the very heart of Sadducean religious and political control, causing them to be “severely vexed” and emotionally distressed.

One Name, Two Trials: The Legal Contrast Between Yeshua and His Followers

The trial of Peter and John, conducted by the same Sanhedrin that tried Jesus, revealed significant procedural and contextual differences. Unlike Jesus’ illegal nighttime trial with hand-picked witnesses, this trial followed proper legal protocols, beginning during daylight hours and allowing for a more structured interrogation. The apostles were held overnight in a legally permissible manner, contrasting sharply with the secretive proceedings against Jesus.

Peter and John demonstrated remarkable boldness, speaking confidently and turning the questioning back on their accusers, whereas Jesus was more restrained during his trial. The apostles were supported by a growing community of 5,000 believers, which created a markedly different political atmosphere. The Sanhedrin now feared public opinion and could not easily condemn or punish the apostles without risking significant social backlash.

A crucial difference was the context of a recent, verifiable miracle. The healed man was present in court, and the Sanhedrin could not deny the miraculous occurrence. This tangible evidence stood in stark contrast to the more abstract accusations during Jesus’ trial. The apostles’ boldness, public support, and the undeniable miracle created a challenging environment for the Sanhedrin, forcing them to take a more cautious approach. Ultimately, the trial highlighted the growing influence of the early Christian movement and the increasing difficulty the religious authorities faced in suppressing it.

When Signs Are Not Enough: Why Some Believed and Others Resisted

The feeding of the 5,000 in Mark 8:10-21 is a key parallel to the 5,000 believers who came to faith in Yeshua during and after Pentecost/Shavuot in Acts. The 5,000 at the feeding miracle represented the people of Israel. The 5,000 believers emerging during Shavuot represents a spiritual harvest.

The number symbolizes divine completeness, spiritual multiplication, and God’s provision for His people during a significant moment of spiritual transformation.

The Pharisees were demanding a sign from Yeshua. While the people who witnessed the feeding of the 5,000 saw it as a sign that Yeshua was a prophet (referencing John 6:14), the Pharisees still came and demanded of Yeshua, “Show us a sign.”

When Yeshua responded to their demand, he essentially said they would not get a sign. The reason for this, was that he had already given them signs – the feeding of the 5,000 – and those who were willing to believe had already recognized it as a sign.

The parallel to Peter and John’s situation is that both scenarios involved:

• A clear miraculous event
• Religious leaders questioning the source of power
• A demand for proof or explanation
• Boldness from the messengers in responding to the challenge.

The key difference is that the Pharisees sought a sign, while the Sadducees asked “by what power” they had performed the healing. In both cases, the religious leaders were attempting to challenge and control the Apostle’s demonstration of divine power.

When the ‘Righteous’ Shut the Gate on Salvation

During the trial, Peter quotes Psalm 118 to demonstrate the deeper significance of Jesus’ identity and the irony of the Sadducees’ actions. The psalm provides a “memory hook” for the listeners, connecting the current events to prophetic promises. There’s an important play on words in Ps. 118:14, where “Yah is my strength” connects to salvation (Yeshua), highlighting the linguistic connection between God’s name and salvation.

There’s also an ironic connection to the gates of righteousness. The Sadducees, who controlled the temple gates and derived their name from “righteousness” (tsadakah), were actually trying to shut the door on salvation. They were attempting to “control the gates” and prevent the spread of the message about Jesus, effectively trying to “slam the gate in His face” despite being the supposed guardians of righteousness.

The Sadducees had, in essence, “put to death their own salvation” by rejecting Jesus. The quotation “Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord” (Psalm 118:26) takes on deeper meaning, as salvation (Yeshua) literally came to them, but they refused to recognize or accept it. It’s beyond irony that those who claimed to be righteous were actually blocking the very salvation God had sent.

At the conclusion of the trial, the Sanhedrin wanted to silence Peter and John even though they could not dispute the truth of their message and the validity of the miracle they performed.

After Peter and John were released, they reported back to their companions. The congregation responded by raising their voice to God with one accord in prayer. The prayer acknowledged God as the creator of heaven and earth, and quoted from Psalm 2, highlighting the nations’ rage against God and His Messiah.
The prayer specifically referenced the conspiracy against Jesus, mentioning Herod, Pontius Pilate, the Gentiles, and the people of Israel gathering together against God’s “holy servant Jesus.” After their prayer, two significant things happened:

• The place where they were assembled was physically shaken
• They were all filled with the Holy Spirit
• They spoke the word of God with boldness

Psalm 2 is one of the most quoted psalms in the apostolic scriptures. The group discussed how the psalm reveals the futility of nations raging against God, with the believers understanding that God is ultimately in control.

The experience strengthened the believers’ confidence in God’s sovereignty and their commitment to speaking boldly despite threats. The prayer’s effect was to strengthen the congregation’s resolve and spiritual power, transforming their fear into boldness through collective prayer and divine intervention.

When things look challenging for believers in Yeshua, God remains in control. Just like in Psalm Two, where nations rage, God ultimately says, “Vengeance is mine.” The key is remembering who we are and who is truly in control. By trusting in God’s sovereignty, believers can speak with boldness, knowing that He will bring everything to a conclusion and a new beginning.

Speaker: Jeff. Summary: Tammy.