Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 43:42 — 7.5MB)
Subscribe: RSS
Discover how Acts 6:7-10 shatters common assumptions about the early church. In this study of Stephen’s ministry, we explore why “a great many of the priests” believed, how signs and wonders relate to the Word of God, and whether Paul really changed the Torah—or remained a faithful Jew. We’ll connect Gamaliel’s warning, Isaiah 55, the “sign of Jonah,” and the accusations against Stephen to uncover a unified, consistent message running through the Book of Acts.
Download study notes in PDF format.
Acts 6 provides a snapshot of a rapidly growing community of disciples in Jerusalem. As the number of believers multiplies, internal tensions surface. Hellenistic Jews complain that their widows are being overlooked in the daily distribution of food (Acts 6:1, NASB 1995). The situation threatens unity and the orderly care of the needy.
The twelve respond by calling the wider group of disciples together. They insist that their primary calling remains “prayer and…the ministry of the word” (Acts 6:4). To protect that calling and still address the problem, they instruct the community to select seven men “of good reputation, full of the Spirit and of wisdom” (Acts 6:3).
The group chooses Stephen, Philip, Prochorus, Nicanor, Timon, Parmenas, and Nicholas, a proselyte from Antioch (Acts 6:5). The apostles pray and lay hands on them (Acts 6:6). The result is striking: “The word of God kept on spreading; and the number of the disciples continued to increase greatly in Jerusalem, and a great many of the priests were becoming obedient to the faith” (Acts 6:7).
The Growth of the Word and the Role of Priests
The narrative stresses the advance of “the word of God.” Growth does not appear as human success only. It results from divine action through faithful servants. The reference to “a great many of the priests” becoming obedient to the faith challenges the assumption that all leaders in the Temple system hardened themselves against Yeshua.
Some manuscript traditions and an ancient Syriac rendering reflect a related reading that mentions Jews more broadly, with some of them being priests. Either way, the text presents significant numbers within the priesthood responding positively. These priests stand near the center of Temple life. They witness the public preaching in the Temple courts. They see healings and hear apostolic testimony.
This setting aligns with the festivals of the LORD. Acts 2–5 unfold around Shavuot (Pentecost), one of the pilgrimage feasts. Many priestly divisions likely serve in the Temple during this period. These priests stand in a “front row” position as Peter preaches and as miracles occur. When Acts 2:37 describes people “pierced to the heart,” many among the priesthood could be included.
Other Jewish sources record phenomena around the period close to 30–33 CE. Rabbinic tradition in tractate Yoma notes several signs in the Temple that ceased to function properly about forty years before its destruction. The eternal light, massive Temple doors opening by themselves, and the failure of the crimson thread to turn white are mentioned. These data points do not settle every question. However, they fit a pattern in which God provides multiple witnesses to confirm a turning point in redemptive history.
The movement of priests into obedience to faith also counters a blanket vilification of the Temple leadership. The New Testament itself presents figures like Nicodemus, Joseph of Arimathea, and Gamaliel as honorable, or at least cautious and fair (John 3:1–2; John 19:38–40; Acts 5:34–40). Later, Acts 15:5 mentions “some of the sect of the Pharisees who had believed,” and Acts 21:20 notes “many thousands…among the Jews…who have believed, and they are all zealous for the Law.”
Gamaliel, the Word, and Isaiah 55
Acts 5 records Gamaliel’s counsel to the Sanhedrin. He urges restraint. Human movements collapse when their leaders die. If a movement comes from God, resistance becomes opposition to God Himself (Acts 5:38–39). That sober warning forms a backdrop to the report that the word of God keeps spreading in Acts 6:7.
Isaiah 55 clarifies how God’s word operates. Verses 10–11 state:
“For as the rain and the snow come down from heaven,
And do not return there without watering the earth…
So will My word be which goes forth from My mouth;
It will not return to Me empty,
Without accomplishing what I desire,
And without succeeding in the matter for which I sent it.” (Isaiah 55:10–11, NASB 1995)
The spread of the word in Acts echoes this promise. The imagery of wind and fire from Acts 2 reinforces this picture. A rushing wind and tongues “as of fire” accompany the coming of the Ruach ha-Kodesh (רוּחַ הַקּוֹדֶשׁ, rúaḥ ha-qódesh – “Holy Spirit”) at Shavuot (Acts 2:2–3). The combination of fire and wind evokes an unstoppable, spreading blaze. When God sends forth His word by His Spirit, the result is expansion, often beyond the calculations of religious authorities.
This framework suggests that Gamaliel’s stance fits Scripture rather than mere caution. Isaiah 55 supports the expectation that if this message arises from God, human opposition cannot halt it.
Stephen: Grace, Power, and Opposition
Acts 6:8 introduces Stephen as “full of grace and power” and as one who performs “great wonders and signs among the people.” Stephen serves within the role assigned earlier, yet his ministry extends beyond logistical service. Signs and wonders accompany his proclamation.
Certain members of the “Synagogue of the Freedmen,” including people from Cyrene, Alexandria, Cilicia, and Asia, begin disputing with him (Acts 6:9). The text notes that they “were unable to cope with the wisdom and the Spirit with which he was speaking” (Acts 6:10). The Greek term for “service” earlier, διάκονος (diákonos – “servant, minister”), already signaled that the seven function as ministers, not mere administrators. Stephen embodies Spirit-filled service that includes both word and power.
Signs, Wonders, and the Word
The discussion turns to the relationship between signs and wonders and the word of God. One question arises: do signs always accompany the word? Are they required for authentic ministry?
Yeshua addresses the desire for signs in Matthew 12:39 and 16:4:
“An evil and adulterous generation craves for a sign; and yet no sign will be given to it but the sign of Jonah.” (NASB 1995)
The Greek term μοιχαλίς (moichalís – “adulterous”) and its Hebrew counterpart נאף (na’af – “to commit adultery”) carry more than moral connotations in marriage. The prophets use this language for Israel’s spiritual unfaithfulness, mixing devotion to YHWH (יהוה, Adonai) with other loyalties and practices. Adultery involves unlawful mixture and divided allegiance.
Israel, however, also receives repeated instructions to heed signs from God. The Hebrew word אוֹת (’ot – “sign”) appears early in the Torah. Celestial bodies serve as signs (Genesis 1:14). The exodus plagues function as signs. Prophetic milestones, including messianic expectations, attach to recognizable signs. The birth of Messiah itself comes with a sign: “you will find a baby wrapped in cloths and lying in a manger” (Luke 2:12).
Thus, the problem in Matthew 12 and 16 is not the category of signs but the motive. An adulterous generation craves spectacle while ignoring the word to which true signs point. The same tension appears in John 6, where crowds pursue Yeshua because of the signs yet resist His teaching when it challenges them.
Jonah in Nineveh illustrates the contrast. Jonah announces impending judgment: “Yet forty days and Nineveh will be overthrown” (Jonah 3:4). The text records no prior sign to validate his message. The people, from king to cattle, respond with fasting and repentance (Jonah 3:5–9). They believe the word before any visible catastrophe arrives.
In the Gospels, Thomas demands a sign of Yeshua’s resurrection (John 20:25). When Yeshua appears and invites him to touch His wounds, Thomas no longer insists on physical proof but confesses, “My Lord and my God!” (John 20:28). Yeshua acknowledges Thomas’s belief based on seeing, then blesses those who believe without seeing (John 20:29). Thomas responds to the word and the presence of the risen Messiah, not to spectacle alone.
In that light, signs in Acts function as confirmations of the word and the kingdom. Mark 16:17–18 speaks of signs following those who believe: casting out demons, speaking in new tongues, protection from deadly harm, and healing the sick. These signs occur “in My name” (ἐν τῷ ὀνόματί μου, en tō onomati mou – “in My name”), which includes character, authority, and covenant reputation, not a mere verbal formula.
The danger emerges when people seek signs to satisfy curiosity, pride, or desire for control, while bypassing repentance and obedience. Signs then become ends in themselves rather than pointers to God’s rule.
Accusations Against Stephen, Yeshua, and Paul
Acts 6:11–14 lists charges against Stephen. The accusations include speaking “blasphemous words against Moses and against God,” opposing “this holy place and the Law,” and claiming that “this Nazarene, Jesus, will destroy this place and alter the customs which Moses handed down to us” (NASB 1995). These charges echo earlier accusations against Yeshua and later criticism of Paul.
Yeshua faces claims that He intends to destroy the Temple (Mark 14:58; John 2:19–21). He speaks of His body as a temple and predicts the Temple’s destruction, but not as a revolutionary slogan. The prophetic tradition already warns of Temple judgment when the people corrupt worship and justice (for example, Jeremiah 7).
Paul repeatedly confronts allegations that he teaches Jews to abandon Moses and circumcision. Acts 21:20–21 reports that many believing Jews remain “zealous for the Law” and that rumors spread that Paul instructs Jews among the nations “to forsake Moses.” In response, the Jerusalem leadership proposes a concrete demonstration. Paul joins four men under a vow, shares in their purification, and pays their expenses (Acts 21:23–24). The passage presents this action as evidence that Paul himself “walk[s] orderly, keeping the Law” (Acts 21:24).
The narrative tension appears again when some interpret Paul’s flexibility as compromise or weakness. Others claim he acts “all things to all men” (1 Corinthians 9:22) in a way that undermines his integrity. Yet Deuteronomy warns that anyone who speaks against the Torah of God or leads people away from it cannot function as a true prophet (Deuteronomy 13:1–5).
If Paul had knowingly taught against God’s Torah for Jews, his credibility as a faithful witness collapses. The early Jerusalem leaders, including James (יַעֲקֹב, Ya‘aqov – “Jacob/James”), Peter (כֵּיפָא, Kefa – “Cephas”), and John (יוֹחָנָן, Yochanan), would also stand compromised if they endorsed such duplicity. Acts 21 instead portrays unified leadership that recognizes Paul’s mission and does not treat him as a lawbreaker.
Later letters, including Galatians and Romans, focus on justification and the inclusion of Gentiles without requiring them to undergo proselyte conversion or circumcision. The Jerusalem Council in Acts 15 already rules that Gentile believers do not need circumcision as an entrance requirement. Instead, they receive a minimal set of prohibitions: idolatry-related meat, blood, strangled animals, and sexual immorality (Acts 15:19–20, 28–29). These instructions align with basic standards found in the Torah for resident aliens.
The accusations against Stephen arise from the same matrix of suspicion. Opposition interprets his teaching about Yeshua and the Temple as an attack on Moses and the Torah. The pattern matches what Yeshua, Peter, John, and Paul encounter at various points. Spirit-filled witnesses who exalt Yeshua as Messiah and uphold God’s purposes frequently face charges of disloyalty to Moses or to the Temple.
Integrity, the Spirit, and the Word
A key thread in Acts 6 concerns integrity before the Ruach ha-Kodesh. Earlier, Acts 5 recounts the deaths of Ananias and Sapphira after they lie about their gift. Peter asks, “Why has Satan filled your heart to lie to the Holy Spirit?” (Acts 5:3). The severity of the response shows that the Spirit will not tolerate deliberate deception in the community’s leadership.
This standard undercuts any theory that the apostles as a whole secretly compromise on core obedience while outwardly appearing faithful. If the Spirit judges hypocrisy in a single couple so decisively, sustained duplicity among all major leaders becomes implausible within the narrative logic of Acts.
Stephen, in contrast, appears as “full of faith and of the Holy Spirit” (Acts 6:5). His ministry manifests grace, power, and fidelity to the word. The same Spirit who exposes falsehood in chapter 5 empowers his bold witness in chapter 6 and 7. The controversy around Stephen thus does not arise from moral inconsistency on his part but from resistance to the implications of the message about Yeshua and the kingdom.
The Centrality of the Word of God
Throughout this section of Acts, the word of God holds central place. The apostles guard their call to “prayer and…the ministry of the word” (Acts 6:4). Service to widows, though essential, occurs under leaders selected for spiritual character and wisdom, not mere administrative ability.
The growth of the community, the obedience of many priests, the courage of Stephen, and the ongoing debates about Torah and Temple all revolve around how people respond to the word. Signs and wonders validate the message but never replace it. When people welcome the word, they repent, believe, and align their lives with God’s revealed will. When they seek signs while ignoring the word, they fall into the pattern of the “evil and adulterous generation” that craves spectacle but resists submission.
Acts 6 thus portrays a community navigating rapid growth, internal pressures, and external opposition while remaining anchored in Scripture, empowered by the Spirit, and centered on Yeshua as Messiah. The interplay between priests, Pharisees, Hellenists, and diaspora Jews shows that the message penetrates every sphere where hearts open to the voice of God.
Speaker: Jeff.
Discover more from Hallel Fellowship
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.